Garmin Forerunner 35 vs Garmin Forerunner HR Comparison

Most sport watches nowadays can perform a wide range of functions, such as smartphone interaction and physical activity assistance. Yet, they become a vital role in your daily life. What’s on your mind right now may be the consideration between Garmin Forerunner 35 vs. Garmin Forerunner HR. Which one is better? Which one should you buy, Garmin Forerunner 35 vs. Garmin Forerunner HR?

Don’t worry. We got your back. In this article, we will layout 6 of the essential criteria for when it comes to choosing a sport watch. Also, we will compare head-to-head Garmin Forerunner 35 vs. Garmin Forerunner HR and help you refine your buying decision. Stay tuned and read on!

6 Considerations When Choosing Garmin Forerunner 35 vs. Garmin Forerunner HR


Criteria           Garmin Forerunner 35Garmin Forerunner HR
Dust-proof and water-resistantYesYes
Screen resolution128x128px148x205px
Water-proof depth rating50m50m

Initially, for those who are planning to bring Garmin Forerunner 35 and Garmin Forerunner HR to the gym or bring them along with your most sporty adventures, they are standardly suited with sweat-resistance and dust-proofing. Garmin Forerunner 35 and Garmin Forerunner HR are even specified for diving as they can withstand water depth threshold up to 50m.

Aside from display on both products, there is one major upgrade worth your consideration, which Garmin Forerunner HR offers a touchscreen, make you feel more responsive to this model. Compared to its predecessor, Garmin Forerunner HR delivered a much higher resolution (148x205px), whereas it is just 128x128px on Garmin Forerunner 35. Moreover, when you place two products side by side, you will tangibly notice the difference as Garmin Forerunner HR is fractionally bigger than its counterpart, which is 47,5g and 37,3g, respectively.

Briefly, Garmin Forerunner HR undoubtedly outperforms Garmin Forerunner 35 in this section with several significant innovations mentioned above.


Criteria           Garmin Forerunner 35Garmin Forerunner HR
Heart rate monitorYesYes
Blood oxygenation level monitoringNoNo
Cadence sensorYesNo

Turning to the sensors, like most of the smartwatches in the market currently, heart rate monitor, GPS, and accelerometer are the must-have sensors of the smartwatches, in order to perform like their name have conveyed, a “smart” watch. Yet in such a segment, it is understandable that the Garmin Forerunner 35 and Garmin Forerunner HR, as well as their peers, do not have blood oxygenation level monitoring, which is the luxury that they do not possess.

On the other hand, each model has its own particular bumps in which Garmin Forerunner 35 is more superior to cycling with a cadence sensor. For those who love discovery and trekking, you will be pleased as Garmin Forerunner HR does a better job in direction guidance and weather procrastination as it is backed up with a compass and a barometer sensor.

Overall, in this section, to decide the winner is depended on which sport you specify at. Apart from that, the two models quite identical to each other.

Activity tracking

Criteria           Garmin Forerunner 35Garmin Forerunner HR
Distance trackingYesYes
Walking step taken trackingYesYes
Sleep trackingYesYes
Sleep reportingYesYes
Calories burnt trackingYesYes
Pace trackingYesYes
Activity reportsNoYes
Elevation trackingNoYes
Route trackingYesYes
Multi-sport modeNoYes
Goal setting modeNoYes
Exercise taggingNoYes
Stroke recognitionNoYes
Stroke counter for swimmingNoYes
Weight trackingNoYes
Water intake trackingNoYes
Golf compatibleNoYes

Since Garmin Forerunner 35 and Garmin Forerunner HR act as your health advisor, your personal trainer, they must keep track of the progress you have made in every aspect of your daily life. Sleep, walking, calories burnt, pace are all in their rada range. Afterward, either product offers you and sleep reports to indicate to you where you currently are in your goal-achieving process.

By contrast, unlike Garmin Forerunner HR, Garmin Forerunner 35 is limited to many fundamental features, such as activity reports, elevation tracking, goal setting, weight tracking, and water intake tracking, which relatively brings it out-line with the competition.

Garmin Forerunner HR is all about efficiency in this section by multi-sport mode and exercise tagging that it possesses. Garmin has even widened Garmin Forerunner HR specification to golf and swimming fields, as they offer stroke recognition, stroke counter for swimming, and gold compatibility to the users.

In this round, after you see all the yeses in those criteria, obviously, you would make your decision to Garmin Forerunner HR without hesitation.


Criteria           Garmin Forerunner 35Garmin Forerunner HR
Android compatibleYesYes
iOS compatibleYesYes
Syncs wirelesslyYesYes
Automatically syncsNoYes
ANT+ connectivityYesYes

In terms of connectivity, both products are quite harmonious with devices as they can communicate with both Android and iOS platforms. The ability to sync wirelessly is also provided in either of them.

The ability to communicate with external devices through ANT+ connection is still retained in Garmin Forerunner 35 and Garmin Forerunner HR. Yet the only upgrade that has been made is the automatic sync, which creates a little more convenience for users.

To conclude, the win is given to Garmin Forerunner HR obviously, but it is not very compelling.


Criteria           Garmin Forerunner 35Garmin Forerunner HR
Battery life9 days8 days
Battery life with GPS on13h13h
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Rechargeable batteryYesYes
Removable batteryNoNo
Wireless chargingNoNo

Garmin has fitted battery level indicator, and rechargeable battery into Garmin Forerunner 35 and Garmin Forerunner HR and yet claim they can last 9 days and 8 days, respectively. Their stamina declines significantly when on GPS, which only lasts 13 hours.

Lack of rechargeable battery on both products is understandable and not very important, but yet among all the up-to-date upgrade currently, Garmin still bundles a wire charging with Garmin Forerunner 35 and Garmin Forerunner HR, made them quite inferior in the market.

Overall, there is no significant difference in this section, and their performance, in our opinion, is in quite an average level.


Criteria           Garmin Forerunner 35Garmin Forerunner HR
Phone locatingYesYes
Silent alarmNoYes
Integrates with social networksNoYes
Inactivity alertsYesYes
Achievement trackingYesYes
Access to online servicesYesYes
Social featuresYesYes
Vibrating alertsYesNo

Garmin did quite good on social features as they integrate Garmin Forerunner 35 and Garmin Forerunner HR with social community and online services.

Of course, notifications must be displayed by the models. Just in case you misplace your phone accidentally, these products can help you with the phone locating feature. Moreover, Stopwatch, inactivity alerts, and achievement tracking are very efficient friends as they will remind you to stay active.

The difference might confuse you as Garmin forerunner HR is upgraded with a silent alarm, but yet it does not retain the vibrating alerts. Another feature that Garmin Forerunner HR possesses is the integration with social networks compared to its counterpart.

Just like the battery section, there is no exceptional upgrade that occurred on such a feature, and once again, they both perform quite normal.

Conclusion: Garmin Forerunner 35 vs. Garmin Forerunner HR – Which One Should You Buy?

In conclusion, apart from trivial battery and feature performance, we would say that Garmin Forerunner HR utterly wins this competition. Garmin Forerunner HR covers a much more extensive range of exercise than Garmin Forerunner 35 and hence, becomes a better assistant that gives you quite an experience.

Choosing Garmin Forerunner 35 if:

  • You need a light-weight smartwatch.
  • You are a cyclist.

Choosing Garmin Forerunner HR if:

  • You need the most exceptional smartwatch among its peers.
  • You require thorough data, especially if you are a swimmer.
  • You are intrigued by a touchscreen.