Fitbit Surge vs. Polar M400 Comparison

Most fitness trackers nowadays can perform a wide range of functions, such as smartphone interaction and physical activity assistance. Yet, they become a vital role in your daily life. What’s on your mind right now may be the consideration between Fitbit Surge vs. Polar M400. Which one is better? Which one should you buy, Fitbit Surge or Polar M400?

Don’t worry. We got your back. In this article, we will layout 6 of the essential criteria for when it comes to choosing a fitness tracker. Also, we will compare head-to-head Fitbit Surge vs. Polar 400 and help you refine your buying decision. Stay tuned and read on!

6 Considerations When Choosing Fitbit Surge vs. Polar M400


Criteria           Fitbit SurgePolar M400
Dust-proof and water-resistantYesYes
Display/TouchscreenYes/ YesYes/No
Water-proof depth rating10m30m

First of all, when it comes to the design specifications of Fitbit Surge and Polar M400, both offer dust-proofing, sweat-resistance, and water-resistance, which are must-have features in this middle-price segment. Granted that they possess display to indicate the data of your current state, yet sorely Fitbit Surge has the touchscreen for those who are after technical advance. The water-proof depth thresholds they can withstand are, in fact, quite mediocre among the performance out there, which is 10m of Fitbit Surge and 30m of Polar M400.

So in this section, there is nothing prominent to be mentioned here as both designs are quite decent, yet in the comparison, Polar M400 probably wins against Fitbit Surge.


Criteria           Fitbit SurgePolar M400
Heart rate monitorYesNo
Cadence sensorNoYes

In terms of the sensors, Fitbit Surge and Polar M400 both possess built-in GPS, offering accurate tracking of runs and cycles from your wrist. The accelerometer is also present on both models, but a huge flaw here of Polar M400 might become a deal-breaker for you as only Fitbit Surge has the heart rate monitor. The lack of most crucial data insights is a disappointing omission, though Polar tries to redeem with the cadence sensor for cyclists; this, after all, is not enough to be honest.

Activity tracking

Criteria           Fitbit SurgePolar M400
Distance trackingYesYes
Walking step taken trackingYesYes
Sleep trackingYesYes
Sleep reportingYesYes
Calories burnt trackingYesYes
Pace trackingNoYes
Activity reportsYesYes
Elevation trackingYesYes
Route trackingNoYes
Goal setting modeYesYes
Exercise taggingYesYes
Weight trackingYesNo
Water intake trackingYesNo
Calorie intake trackingYesNo

Apart from that, these two are well matched for sports tracking: distance, walking step, calorie burnt, elevation, activity reports, goal setting, exercise tagging are all present. Sleep tracking is also provided by Fitbit Surge and Polar M400, but we afraid that Fitbit Surge is more specialized in this field, while Polar M400 is just an accelerometer-based sleep tracking.

 Surprisingly, Polar M400’s provided data is relatively thorough for runners and cyclers, as Polar M400 offers pace and route tracking. In turn, Fitbit brings their product in-line with the competition by supporting features like weight, water intake, and calorie intake tracking.


Criteria           Fitbit SurgePolar M400
Android compatibleYesYes
iOS compatibleYesYes
Windows compatibleYesNo
Syncs wirelesslyYesYes
Automatically syncsYesNo
Mac OS X compatibleYesNo

Fitbit Surge and Polar M400 are quite harmonious with a vast proportion of devices as they both support the Android and iOS platforms. The ability to sync wirelessly is also present on both models; on the other hand, you might feel inconvenient as Polar M400 missed out on the automatic sync. Fitbit Surge also shows superiority at the Mac OS X and Windows platform support, widen the connectivity border for you to synchronize.


Criteria           Fitbit SurgePolar M400
Battery life7 days24 days
Battery level indicatorNoYes
Rechargeable batteryYesYes

Here is where Polar M400 gets a mark in this competition. Both Fitbit Surge and Polar M400 obviously have stepped up to the rechargeable battery, yet the battery level indicator is facilitated only on Polar M400. Polar M400’s battery longevity is also utterly exceptional, promises up to 24 days compared to just seven days of Fitbit Surge, letting your tracker remain connected to your wrist for an extremely long time between charges.


Criteria           Fitbit SurgePolar M400
Silent alarmYesNo
Integrates with social networksYesNo
Inactivity alertsYesYes
Achievement trackingYesYes
Access to online servicesYesYes
Social featuresYesYes
Free AD-free appYesYes
Sync to the cloudYesYes
Exercise diaryYesYes
Acquires GPS fasterNoYes
Predict ovulationYesNo
Designed for womenYesNo
Music playbackYesNo
Voice feedbackNoYes

Turning to the features, both are near identical across both fitness tracker, as a built-in stopwatch, inactivity alerts, achievement tracking are all present. Both also come with the free AD-free apps, in which the data insights within the app are top quality, with loads of data to review post-workout and social features.

On the other hand, you might notice the difference here as Fitbit Surge once again win the competition with the specifications for women, additional silent alarm, and notification on-board. On the contrary, Polar M400 can acquire the GPS much faster than Fitbit Surge, but in general, it is not that significant.

Verdict: Fitbit Surge vs. Polar M400 – Which One Is Better?

At the bottom line, Polar M400 and Fitbit Surge both suits the most basic need your demands. But to be frank, in this competition, the only selling point of Polar M400 emerges in the battery’s longevity. Apart from that, everything else about the Fitbit Surge turns this model into a superior choice for you.