Fitbit Ionic vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Comparison

Most smartwatches nowadays can perform a wide range of functions, such as smartphone interaction and physical activity assistance. Yet, they become a vital role in your daily life. What’s on your mind right now may be the consideration between Fitbit Ionic vs. Samsung Galaxy watch. Which one is better? Which one should you buy, Fitbit Ionic or Samsung Galaxy watch?

Don’t worry. We got your back. In this article, we will layout 6 of the essential criteria for when it comes to choosing a smartwatch. Also, we will compare the head-to-head Fitbit Ionic vs. Samsung Galaxy watch and help you refine your buying decision. Stay tuned and read on!

6 Considerations When Choosing Fitbit Ionic vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch


Criteria           Fitbit IonicSamsung Galaxy Watch
Dust-proof and water-resistantYesYes
Branded damage-resistant glassYesYes
Replaceable watch bandYesYes
Screen resolution250x348px360x360px
Always-On DisplayYesYes
Water-proof depth rating50m50m
OLED or Amoled displayNoYes
Sapphire Glass DisplayNoNo
Force touch/3d touchNoNo

First of all, when it comes to the high-class segment, you can imagine that their performance is probably exceptional in all feature sets. You aren’t wrong. Fitbit Ionic and Samsung Galaxy Watch offer all the luxury resilience that you are likely seeking for dust-proofing, water-resistance, sweat-resistance, branded damage-resistant glass. Yet they are not enough to reach the top-notch, which lacks the sapphire glass display. Fitbit Ionic and Galaxy Watch both have a touchscreen display, although they do not possess the convenience regards to force touch/3D touch feature. The only mediocre spot that on these models is the water depth threshold they can withstand (50m), but you do not need to care about it as they are good enough for the vast majority of users.

On the other hand, the most obviously crucial difference is when you place those two side-by-side, you definitely notice that Samsung Galaxy Watch’s screen is much sharper and thinner than its counterpart with a broader look angle as Galaxy Watch provides a 360x360px Oled display when Fitbit Ionic still a 250x348px LCD. Their difference in size even highlights the sharpness distinction between those two, when Fitbit and Samsung Galaxy Watch screen size is 1.42″ and 1.3″ respectively.

Overall, Samsung Galaxy Watch is ultimately winning against Fitbit Ionic in this section, as Samsung deserves a great credit for the OLED display.


Criteria           Fitbit IonicSamsung Galaxy Watch
Heart rate monitorYesYes
Blood oxygenation level monitoringYesNo
Temperature sensorNoNo
Cadence sensorNoNo
Perspiration monitoringNoNo
3d compassNoNo

In terms of the sensors, despite all the glory in the previous section, Fitbit Ionic and Galaxy Watch’s sensors are quite standard. Heart rate monitor, GPS accelerometer, and gyroscope are all facilitated in those two models as fundamental sensors. Sadly Fitbit and Samsung have declined to include other modern technology in their products such as temperature sensors, cadence sensors, perspiration monitoring, and a 3D compass.

On the contrary, apart from the absence of compass and barometer on Samsung Galaxy Watch compared to Fitbit Ionic, Samsung makes a huge step-up as equipped the product with a blood oxygenation level monitoring, which is an up-to-date feature, to provide more accurate and specific data for users.

In this round, it is hard to determine the winner here as you might be interested in different sensors that they offer, but overall, the performance is perhaps ordinary.

Activity tracking

Criteria           Fitbit IonicSamsung Galaxy Watch
Distance trackingYesYes
Walking step taken trackingYesYes
Sleep trackingYesYes
Sleep reportingYesYes
Calories burnt trackingYesYes
Pace trackingYesYes
Activity reportsYesYes
Elevation trackingYesYes
Route trackingNoYes
Multi-sport modeYesYes
Goal setting modeYesYes
Exercise taggingYesYes
Stroke recognitionNoYes
Stroke counter for swimmingYesYes
Weight trackingYesYes
Water intake trackingYesYes
Golf compatibleNoNo
Automatic activity detectionYesYes
Diving compatibleNoNo

Just came through a boring section frankly, you might feel more cheerful in this field as you can see all the yeses, a lot of yeses in the table above. They are both striking at exercise analysis and tracking in general, care about all aspects of your life. They are all about efficiency: Distance, walking step, sleep, calorie burnt, pace, elevation, stroke counter, weight, water intake are all detected in their radar. Afterward, the progress that you have made is all laid down in front of your table. When you possess one of the products in such segment, all you have to do is going on your exercise. Data will automatically transfer to you with the help of multi-sport mode, exercise tagging, and automatic activity detection. The flaw is neither product specifies in golf and diving as perhaps disappointing a few potential buyers.

The features that Fitbit Ionic misses out compared to Samsung Galaxy Watch are stroke recognition and route tracking. But you should not care about this as it is not a big deal.

In conclusion, Samsung Galaxy Watch is slightly outperformed Fitbit Ionic, but we still give a draw to this round, both are exceptional and outstanding in general.


Criteria           Fitbit IonicSamsung Galaxy Watch
Android compatibleYesYes
iOS compatibleYesYes
Windows Phone compatibleYesNo
Syncs wirelesslyYesYes
Automatically syncsYesYes
NFC connectivityYesYes
ANT+ connectivityNoNo
Supports Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth version44.2
Support Wi-Fi 4YesYes
Cellular moduleNoYes
Support Wi-Fi 5NoNo
Window compatibleYesNo
Max OS XYesNo

According to the table above, Fitbit Ionic and Samsung Galaxy Watch coordinate with many devices as they are both compatible with the Android and iOS platforms. The ability to sync wirelessly and automatically are also abroad, which is quite ordinary among all of their peers. Furthermore, Fitbit and Samsung’s products come with the NFC connectivity to the external devices, widen the range of compatibility for their models. The significant upgrade is when they still retain the Wi-Fi, the connection using Wi-Fi 4 technology but not the latest version of it, Wi-Fi 5, which transfers faster rate and improves security compared to its predecessor.

The difference is, Fitbit Ionic is more harmonious than Galaxy Watch as Window Phone, Mac OS X is also supported. Yet the connection between them is less unstable than its counterpart, which is still bundled with a Bluetooth version 4, compared to version 4.2 of Samsung Galaxy Watch.

To sum up, if you have a lot of devices needed to synchronize, you might give Fitbit a raise. Apart from that, there are solid jobs with their new feature set, but in fact, they are not revolutionary.


Criteria           Fitbit IonicSamsung Galaxy Watch
Battery life5 days3 days
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Rechargeable batteryYesYes
Wireless chargingYesYes
Solar power batteryNoNo
Removable batteryNoNo

Obviously, modern technology usually comes with a high demand for energy. Because of that, Fitbit Ionic and Samsung Galaxy Watch would not last long as the stamina is just five days of Fitbit Ionic and just three days of Samsung Galaxy Watch. The only crucial step-up has been made is wireless charging, but it still conventional among their peers. Of course, the battery level indicator and rechargeable battery are still recycled.

There is another draw given to this section as their performance is once again very mediocre in terms of battery.


Criteria           Fitbit IonicSamsung Galaxy Watch
Phone locatingYesYes
Call controlYesYes
Silent alarmYesYes
Vibrating alertsYesYes
Integrates with social networksYesYes
Inactivity alertsYesYes
Achievement trackingYesYes
Access to online servicesYesNo
Social featuresYesNo
Call answeringNoYes
Voice commandNoYes
Internal storage2.5GB4GB
Smart alarmNoNo
Built-in camera remote control functionNoYes
Acquires GPS fasterNoNo
Shake to dismiss notificationNoNo
Barcode scanner on appYesNo
External memory slotNoNo
Front cameraNoNo
3.5mm audio jack socketNoNo

It is not surprising that in such segment, the features are utterly sufficient even with the most modern one, are all included. Phone locating, notification, call control, silent alarm, stopwatch, vibrating alerts, integrates with social networks, inactivity alerts, achievement tracking are all fitted in Fitbit Ionic, and Samsung galaxy watch. The manufacturers have gotten rid of the obsolete 3.5mm audio jack socket, but yet they declined to include some up-to-date features such as a smart alarm, gesture control, external memory slot, and a front camera.

Samsung might not pay their attention to its community as there is no online services and social features of the product. But still, it remains one of the high-class smartwatches as integrating call answering, voice command, and built-in camera remote control function into Galaxy Watch, which is the luxury that Fitbit Ionic does not possess. In terms of storage, once again, Samsung creates a deal-maker that it has 4GB of the capacity, compared to just 2,5GB of Fitbit Ionic.

To conclude, you might be convinced as we are that this section is a sweet spot of Samsung Galaxy Watch. Despite the restriction to the users’ community, there are very modern features that Samsung’s smartwatch possesses, which is probably excited you.

Conclusion: Fitbit Ionic vs Samsung Galaxy Watch – Which One Should You Buy?

Eventually, both Fitbit Ionic and Samsung Galaxy Watch are flagship models, and hence they are equipped with the finest feature they can get from the manufacturers. In this competition, Samsung Galaxy Watch slightly outperforms its rival, with the more eye-watering design and features.

Choosing Samsung Galaxy Watch if:

  • You are fascinated by the outward appearance.
  • You need a more accurate and thorough data of your exercises.
  • You are a technology lover with all the advanced features of it

Choosing Fitbit Ionic if:

  • Your battery life requirement is quite high.
  • You need to monitor your blood oxygenation level for professional purposes.
  • You want to create compatibility with Windows and Mac OX platform devices.