Fitbit Charge 2 vs. Microsoft Band Comparison

Most fitness trackers nowadays can perform a wide range of functions, such as smartphone interaction and physical activity assistance. Yet, they become a vital role in your daily life. What’s on your mind right now may be the consideration between Fitbit Charge 2 vs. Microsoft Band. Which one is better? Which one should you buy, Fitbit Charge 2 or Microsoft Band?

Don’t worry. We got your back. In this article, we will layout 6 of the essential criteria for when it comes to choosing a fitness tracker. Also, we will compare head-to-head Fitbit Charge 2 vs. Microsoft Band and help you refine your buying decision. Stay tuned and read on!

6 Considerations When Choosing Fitbit Charge 2 vs. Microsoft Band

Design

Criteria           Fitbit Charge 2Microsoft Band
Dust-proof and water-resistantYesNo
OLED or AMOLED displayYesNo
Sweat-resistantYesYes
Display/TouchscreenYes/NoYes/Yes
Replaceable watch bandYesNo
Width21.4mm19mm
Lowest potential operating temperature-10°C-10°C
Maximum altitude30000feet39370 feet
Maximum operating temperature45°C40°C

Since Microsoft first jumped into the fitness tracker market, you might do not want to put too much of expectation as it still needs to improve. When it comes to the design, both Microsoft band and Fitbit Charge can withstand the humid condition during exercise. Yet in the long-term, Microsoft band’s inner components is hard to remain intact because of the absence of dust-proofing and water-resistance, which Fitbit Charge 2 does a pretty good job. The durability in the high-heat condition of Fitbit Charge 2 is also 5°C higher than that of Microsoft Band.       For those who concerns about the high, the manufacturers instruct that the maximum altitude Fitbit Charge 2 and Microsoft Band can endure is 30000 feet and 39370 feet respectively.

Turning to the display, both enable you to see the current state details directly on your wrist, but interestingly, as a newcomer, Microsoft Band outperforms Fitbit Charge 2 with a touchscreen. Fitbit Charge 2 has an AMOLED display, and that is the reason why you notice it seems thinner than its rival.

In this round, the win is probably given to Microsoft Band, as the touchscreen might sound ears-catching, but it is in fact not very essential.

Sensors

Criteria           Fitbit Charge 2Microsoft Band
Heart rate monitorYesYes
GPSNoYes
AccelerometerYesYes
Monitors perspirationNoYes

Regards to the sensors, it is a weakened field now that smartwatches are getting all the attention, but you look at the sensors of Microsoft Band, the data insights probably quite thorough compared to Fitbit Charge 2. Both offer heart rate monitor and accelerometer to track your exercises more efficiently with the sensors-based features. Yet Microsoft opens up a whole audiences of potential buyers, through the onboard GPS, offering accurate tracking of runs and cycles from your wrist. Moreover, the perspiration monitor is also a big new addition of Microsoft Band for those who are after the intensity data of your exercises.

To conclude, with a newbie in the fitness market, there is no doubt that Microsoft does a pretty good job in this field.

Activity tracking

Criteria           Fitbit Charge 2Microsoft Band
Distance trackingYesYes
Walking step taken trackingYesYes
Sleep trackingYesYes
Sleep reportingYesYes
Calories burnt trackingYesYes
Pace trackingYesNo
Activity reportsYesYes
Elevation trackingYesNo
Multi-sport modeYesYes
Goal setting modeYesYes
Exercise taggingYesNo
Weight trackingYesNo
Water intake trackingYesNo
Automatic activity detectionYesNo

Turning to the sport and fitness tracking, Fitbit Charge 2 and Microsoft Band are quite basic for those who are after the thorough metrics and insights. Distance, walking step taken, calorie burnt, activity reports, goal setting are all present. There is also profiles for sleeping, REM cycles based on your heart rate state.

Other than that, Fitbit Charge 2’s tracking is all about efficiency: elevation tracking, exercise tagging, weight tracking, water intake tracking, and automatic activity detection, which makes Microsoft Band inferior in the competition.

Connectivity

Criteria           Fitbit Charge 2Microsoft Band
Android compatibleYesYes
iOS compatibleYesYes
Windows compatibleYesNo
Syncs wirelesslyYesYes
Automatically syncsYesYes
Windows phone compatibleNoYes
Mac OS X compatibleYesNo
Bluetooth version44

Fitbit Charge 2 and Microsoft Band give you plenty of connectivity options. Both are harmonious with Android and iOS platforms. There are also ability to sync wirelessly and automatically on both models. Yet the Bluetooth is still stopped at the version 4, which is by far not the fastest performance on the market.

The distinctions here for you to consider is the Windows and Mac OS X, which are typically PC’s platforms, are only present on Fitbit Charge 2. But in turn, for those who prefer Windows phone, Microsoft band is definitely fit for you as Fitbit Charge 2 missed out such compatibility.

Battery

Criteria           Fitbit Charge 2Microsoft Band
Battery life7 days2 days
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Rechargeable batteryYesYes

Both Fitbit Charge 2 and Microsoft step up to the rechargeable battery and possess the battery level indicator for you to inform the current state. While Fitbit Charge 2 promises up to 7 days of battery life, Microsoft Band might disappoint you with its insubstantial battery longevity, which is just 2 days in function.

Features

Criteria           Fitbit Charge 2Microsoft Band
NotificationYesYes
Silent alarmYesYes
StopwatchYesYes
Vibrating alertsYesNo
Integrates with social networksYesYes
Inactivity alertsYesNo
Achievement trackingYesYes
Access to online servicesYesYes
Social featuresYesNo
Free AD-free appYesYes
Exercise diaryYesYes
Sync to the cloudYesYes
External heart rate monitor compatibleYesYes
CoachingNoYes
Music playbackYesNo
Designed for womenYesNo
Predicts ovulationYesNo
Start date predictionYesNo
Voice commandsNoYes

Undoubtedly that a lot of features are abroad on Fitbit Charge 2 and Microsoft Band namely notification, silent alarm, stopwatch, and exercise diary, both come with a free AD-free app to sync and analyze your data, along with built-in features in the app such as external heart rate monitor compatibility, achievement tracking, online services. Yet Microsoft still doesn’t hold a candle to the vibrating alerts, inactivity alerts, and social features, which Fitbit Charge 2 outperforms with that. Especially, Fitbit is well-known as the women-support watch band with some specifications for them, ultimately widen up the functional field in comparison with Microsoft Band 2.

Verdict: Fitbit Charge 2 vs. Microsoft Band – Which One Is Better?

As you can see, Fitbit Charge 2 is a pretty decent fitness band, which provide you so much more essential metrics and data insights than Microsoft Band. Yet on the other hand, Microsoft Band still has its own specifications to bring it in-line with the competition but in overall, Fitbit Charge 2 still win the race.

Choosing Fitbit Charge 2 if:

  • You are after the battery longevity.
  • You need to be provided with loads of thorough data insights.
  • You need to synchronized the data with the laptop or PC.

Choosing Microsoft Band if:

  • You are a technology geek and touchscreen is a must-have feature to you.
  • You are runner and your demand is a built-in GPS.
  • You own a Windows Phone.