Fitbit Blaze vs Garmin Forerunner 35 Comparison

Most smartwaches nowadays can perform a wide range of functions, such as smartphone interaction and physical activity assistance. Yet, they become a vital role in your daily life. What’s on your mind right now may be the consideration between ProductA vs ProductB. Which one is better? Which one should you buy, Fitbit Blaze or Garmin Forerunner 35?

Don’t worry. We got your back. In this article, we will layout 6 of the essential criteria for when it comes to choosing a smartwatch. Also, we will compare head-to-head Fitbit Blaze vs Garmin Forerunner 35 and help you refine your buying decision. Stay tuned and read on.

6 Considerations When Choosing Fitbit Blaze vs. Garmin Forerunner 35

Design

Criteria           Fitbit BlazeGarmin Forerunner 35
Dust-proof and water-resistantNoYes
Sweat-resistantYesYes
Display/TouchscreenYes/YesYes/No
Screen resolution272x340px128x128px
Size1.6”1.3”

First off, if you want to go to the gym with Fitbit Blaze and Garmin Forerunner 35, you could be pleased as both are sweat-resistant. However, there is a crucial downside of Fitbit Blaze here, which has no Dust-proofing and water-resistance compared to Garmin Forerunner 35. You definitely want to think twice as the inner components probably might not last long in such conditions. Interestingly, Fitbit Blaze earns a big win when it comes to displaying. Fitbit Blaze offers a 1.6’’ touchscreen with a 272x340px resolution, delivered by far the finest performance among the line-up. Those advantages, sadly for Garmin’s fan, are which Garmin Forerunner 35 would let you down as it just supports a 1.3’’ normal screen with 128x128px.

For this section, we probably give the win to Fitbit Blaze for its superior display, but in terms of resilience, Garmin Forerunner 35 might have better stamina.

Sensors

Criteria           Fitbit BlazeGarmin Forerunner 35
Heart rate monitorYesYes
GPSNoYes
AccelerometerYesYes
Cadence sensorNoYes
Blood oxygenation level monitoringNoNo

Sensors are a feature where questions do remain. Both Fitbit and Garmin do claim to have fitted their products with a heart rate monitor and accelerometer. Lack of blood oxygenation level monitoring also occurs in these products, which is understandable in this segment. If you are still craving this feature, it might come with a high cost.

Promisingly, Garmin Forerunner 35 once again please those who love sports as GPS and cadence sensor are aboard in this model, which help you to specify your exercises quite efficiently.

Overall, Garmin has done a pretty good job on the product compared to Fitbit. Still, it is not revolutionary if you look more rooted in their peers; they are just fundamental features that are possessed in almost every model out there.

Activity tracking

Criteria           Fitbit BlazeGarmin Forerunner 35
Distance trackingYesYes
Walking step taken trackingYesYes
Sleep trackingYesYes
Sleep reportingYesYes
Calories burnt trackingYesYes
Pace trackingNoYes
Activity reportsYesNo
Elevation trackingYesNo
Route trackingNoYes

As for the activity tracking, you could call Fitbit Blaze and Garmin Forerunner 35 as your health adviser, but not very specific enough. They both possess distance tracking, walking step taken tracking, sleep tracking, sleep reporting, and calorie burnt tracking, which provides you quite average data to track your process.

On the other hand,  the differences are not as big as you might expect but might even confuse you. Pace tracking and route tracking have two yeses by Garmin Forerunner 35, whereas Fitbit Blaze support activity reports and elevation tracking. It seems like Garmin Forerunner 35 provides more particular data, but in general, Fitbit Blaze slightly outperforms.

To conclude, we give Fitbit Blaze and Garmin Forerunner 35 a draw in this round, as the differences are utterly obscure to distinguish.

Connectivity

Criteria           Fitbit BlazeGarmin Forerunner 35
Android compatibleYesYes
iOS compatibleYesYes
Windows Phone compatibleYesNo
Syncs wirelesslyYesYes
Automatically syncsYesNo
ANT+ connectivityNoYes

Fitbit Blaze and Garmin Forerunner 35 are quite harmonious with devices as they are compatible with Android and iOS platforms. Yet Windows phones are sorely supported on Fitbit Blaze. The ability to sync wirelessly is still retained on either product, but Fitbit generates a slight convenience for you as it provides automatic sync. In contrast, Garmin compromises the lack of oxygen blood monitor by the ANT+ connection, widens its range of capacity.

Battery

Criteria           Fitbit BlazeGarmin Forerunner 35
Battery life5 days9 days
Wireless chargingNoNo
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Rechargeable batteryYesYes
Charge time2h2h
Removable batteryNoNo

It is quite noticeable that their battery performance is quite mediocre among their peers. Fitbit Blaze could last maximum to 5 days whilst Garmin Forerunner 35 has much more stamina, up to 9 days, and both could be recharged fully after 2 hours of charging. Of course, the manufacturers have fitted Battery level indicator and rechargeable battery into the products, but they still bundle their models with wired charging. It’s a disappointing omission, which will look even more of an oversight down the line. 

Garmin Forerunner 35, compared to its counterpart, is winning in this round, which its battery capacity nearly doubles to Fitbit Blaze.

Features

Criteria           Fitbit BlazeGarmin Forerunner 35
Phone locatingYesYes
NotificationYesYes
Call controlYesNo
Silent alarmYesNo
StopwatchYesYes
Vibrating alertsNoYes
Integrates with social networksYesNo
Inactivity alertsNoYes
Achievement trackingNoYes
Access to online servicesNoYes
Social featuresNoYes

Some basic features that Fitbit Blaze and Garmin Forerunner 35 still offers to users are showing notification and stopwatch, and that is. Both manufacturers care about the case that you accidentally misplace your phone and provide their products with a phone locating feature.

Turning to the distinctions, Fitbit does a better job of synchronizing the call control to its function and also the ability to integrate with social networks and an additional silent alarm. But compared to Garmin Forerunner 35, it might be a dealbreaker that Fitbit Blaze cannot motivate users to stay active by achievement tracking and inactivity alerts. Fitbit Blaze is also restricted to users’ community and online services.

In this round, Garmin Forerunner 35 has the compelling win against Fitbit Blaze with a connection with outsources while there is just one significant step-up on Fitbit Blaze, which is controlling the call.

Conclusion: Fitbit Blaze vs. Garmin Forerunner 35 – Which One Should You Buy?

As we could see above, Fitbit Blaze performs much as a smartwatch, which provides all convenient features, and Garmin Forerunner 35 seems to specify more at sports and exercises.

Choosing Fitbit Blaze if:

  • You own a Windows Phone.
  • You are fascinated by a high-resolution display.
  • You are excited by general training, not the most sporty adventures.

Choosing Garmin Forerunner 35 if:

  • You need those up-to-date sensors to provide accurate and thorough data.
  • Your demand for battery life is quite high.
  • You want to interact with other users to share your experience.