Apple Watch vs Fossil Q Marshal Comparison

Most smartwatches nowadays can perform a wide range of functions, such as smartphone interaction and physical activity assistance. Yet, they become a vital role in your daily life. What’s on your mind right now may be the consideration between Apple Watch or Fossil Q Marshal. Which one is better? Which one should you buy, Apple Watch vs. Fossil Q Marshal?

Don’t worry. We got your back. In this article, we will layout 6 of the essential criteria for when it comes to choosing a smartwatch. Also, we will compare head-to-head Apple Watch vs. Fossil Q Marshal and help you refine your buying decision. Stay tuned and read on!

6 Considerations When Choosing Apple Watch vs. Fossil Q Marshal

Design

Criteria           Apple WatchFossil Q Marshal
Dust-proof and water-resistantNoYes
Sweat-resistantYesYes
Display/TouchscreenYesYes
Replaceable watch bandYesYes
Screen resolution312x390px320x290px
Always-On DisplayNoYes
Screen size1.5’’1.42’’
OLED or AMOLED displayYesNo
Sapphire glass displayYesNo
Force touch/3d touchyesNo

The first thing we want to state is the durability of a smartwatch. Apple Watch and Fossil Q Marshal both offer sweat-resistance for those who intend to go to the gym or be on a sporty adventure. But it is a significant downgrade of Apple Watch as Apple refused to include dust-proofing and water-resistance in their product, which Fossil has noticed.

Turning to the display, both Apple Watch and Fossil Q Marshal have equipped touchscreen. But this is also where Apple Watch distinguishes itself. So far, Apple’s products are known as they are very remarkable in design and display, and yes, once again, this section justifies this reputation. Apple Watch is facilitated with a 312x390px display, quite notable, but Fossil Q Marshal does an excellent job as well, with a 320x290px display. Apple Watch can not endure the severe conditions, but Apple compensates by a sapphire glass display to avoid scratch and impact. Their screen is slightly more prominent too, which 1.5’’ of Apple Watch and 1.42’’ of Fossil Q Marshal. An OLED and 3D touch offered to Apple Watch is quite surprising, as you will feel more responsive to the product. The only flaw of Apple Watch is the absence of always-on display feature but still not a big deal.

Overall, apart from the durability, Apple Watch completely outperforms at the design compared to Fossil Q Marshal.

Sensors

Criteria           Apple WatchFossil Q Marshal
Heart rate monitorYesNo
GyroscopeNoYes
AccelerometerYesYes
CompassYesNo

Regards to sensors, it is perhaps not a deal-maker for a smartwatch. An accelerometer is the only sensor that both products possess. Apart from that, sadly, some other fundamental sensor is not provided on Fossil Q Marshal such as heart rate monitor and compass, which Apple Watch does have it. In turn. Fossil Q Marshal has an extra gyroscope, but it is not enough to bring Fossil Q Marshal in-line with the competition.

In this section, tangibly, Apple Watch deserves a win against Fossil Q Marshal.

Activity tracking

Criteria           Apple WatchFossil Q Marshal
Distance trackingYesYes
Walking step taken trackingYesYes
Sleep trackingYesYes
Sleep reportingNoYes
Calories burnt trackingYesYes
Pace trackingYesNo
Activity reportsYesYes
Elevation trackingYesNo
Route trackingYesNo
Goal setting modeYesYes
Exercise taggingYesYes
Weight trackingYesNo
Water intake trackingNoYes

Turning to activity tracking, it is conspicuous that Apple Watch and Fossil Q Marshal possess adequate essential features to fulfill your expectation in terms of tracking, namely, distance tracking, walking step taken tracking, sleep tracking, calorie burnt tracking, goal setting mode, exercise tagging, and activity reports. They are a great assistant to involve in every aspect of your daily basis.

Now is the distinction, Apple Watch once again has more specific features than its rival, which Pace tracking, elevation tracking, weight tracking, and route tracking are offer to Apple Watch while Fossil Q Marshal does not have. But still, Apple Watch doesn’t hold a candle to sleep reporting and water intake tracking, but these features are more than you need.

In these terms, even if they are competent in different fields, but we still give it a draw as both products seem to deliver solid work to users.

Connectivity

Criteria           Apple WatchFossil Q Marshal
Android compatibleNoYes
iOS compatibleYesYes
Syncs wirelesslyYesNo
Automatically syncsYesNo
NFC connectivityYesNo
Bluetooth version44.1
Supports Wi-FiYesYes
Supports Wi-Fi 4NoYes

Either model supports the iOS platform, but Apple still bundles its products themselves with the absence of Android compatibility. For Apple’s lovers, it is not a matter. Apple’s products are very friendly with users, as they will automatical as much as they can with the ability to syncs wirelessly and automatically, which Fossil Q Marshal does not possess.

In terms of connection, Apple Watch offers an NFC connectivity, which enables you to connect nearly devices with it easily. Both are supported Wi-Fi, but in the regular connections, Fossil Q Marshal dominates Apple Watch with a better Bluetooth (4.1) and Wi-Fi (4) version.

Overall, Apple Watch helps users with many beneficial features in this round, but Fossil Q Marshal could stand toe-to-toe with it by better connection.

Battery

Criteria           Apple WatchFossil Q Marshal
Battery life0.75 days1 day
Wireless chargingYesNo
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Rechargeable batteryYesYes

Battery level indicator and rechargeable battery are offered to both models. But you might feel frustrated when you see their stamina, Fossil Q Marshal, and Apple Watch only last up to one day, which is a disappointing omission. The only significant step-up here is Apple has fit wireless charging into Apple Watch, while Fossil Q Marshal is still limited to a wired charger.

This round might be a deal-breaker to many of you as their battery capacity is too small compared to others. But in such a segment, it is quite acceptable.

Features

Criteria           Apple WatchFossil Q Marshal
Phone locatingYesNo
NotificationYesYes
Call controlYesNo
Can be used to answer callsYesNo
StopwatchYesYes
Voice commandsYesNo
Integrates with social networksYesYes
The built-in camera remote control functionYesNo
Achievement trackingYesYes

Regards to features, Apple Watch and Fossil Q Marshal have similarities in which notification, stopwatch, social network integration, and achievement tracking are supported. Apart from that, you can see that Apple Watch’s features are all about efficiency: a better synchronization with your phone by phone locating, call control and call answering feature, voice commands (an up-to-date feature), and built-in camera remote control function.

There is no doubt that Apple has packed a lot into the Apple Watch. The question is whether these features are in the right places for you. But the win is definitely given to Apple Watch in this round.

Conclusion: Apple Watch vs. Fossil Q Marshal – Which One Should You Buy?

At the bottom line, Apple Watch and Fossil Q Marshal are quite functional smartwatches with all the essential features that are provided. Apple Watch probably would fascinate you with an eye-watering display, the thing that Apple is always good at, but in turn, you might have to keep it carefully from severe condition or heavy sport. If you can, luckily, Fossil Q Marshal can persevere.

Choosing Apple Watch if:

  • You want an outstanding display with a more responsive function.
  • You are trying to build an Apple ecosystem.
  • You don’t want to depend on your phone all the time.

Choosing Fossil Q Marshal if:

  • You are a heavy sporter
  • You are pretty grumpy about connection.